Talk:Skjoldhøjkilen

Refimprove tag on page Skjoldhøjkilen[edit]

The following discussion was copied from User talk:Umais Bin Sajjad (RhinoMind (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)):[reply]

Hello. You left a refimprove tag on page Skjoldhøjkilen. Im the original author.

Actually the external links is also the sources to the article. I have changed the headline. Does this solve "your" problem? If not I need specific details and explanations. And best of all: correct the problem yourself. RhinoMind (talk) 11:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article lacks references, only one reference is not enough to show article notability. Please add further references UBS talk 12:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only one reference is not enough to show article notability - you shouldn't be judging how notable a subject is by its Wikipedia article and neither should you expect a Wikipedia article that has just been created to already be of a sufficient quality to demonstrate its notability. Do a quick Google search! Jr8825 • Talk 12:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is July 2013 article, what does "just been created" mean here? And notability on Wikipedia english is not related with google search. UBS talk 12:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, I thought you had tagged up the article whilst patrolling the most recently created pages. I wasn't saying that Google is a brilliant way of determining notability for Wikipedia, but it's better than nothing and gives a good impression of how much coverage a topic has had on the internet - the only better way to determine notability would probably be going to the library. I'm not trying to tell you off - I just wanted to say that in my opinion it's better to spend longer on articles fixing problems instead of just tagging them - who else is going to make the changes? Jr8825 • Talk 12:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think article creator should be responsible for basic elements, to take it to a standard so that other users take interest in that article. UBS talk 13:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know the Wikimedia growth team has plans to improve the article creator, but until then it's largely up to us new page patrollers to clean-up new articles to a fairly acceptable standard. Jr8825 • Talk 13:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Maybe I can squeeze in a few lines :-) Actually the page is using a total of three independent sources. One for a particular in-line ref and two as major sources to the entire page. I can add more, but many other sources are superficial and just cites these three originals. What do you think? RhinoMind (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is that to move sources section into references and shape them to ciatation, after that just remove the issue tag cheers! UBS talk 16:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed the ref-improve tag. Comment here if necessary. RhinoMind (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]