Talk:Site A

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago High‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics: History Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

Military history: Technology / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Untitled[edit]

The article says the marker has been damaged by chiseling off the word "NO" on the marker, but the article doesn't show that the word "NO" actually occurred on the marker. The closest word is "NOT" in "DO NOT DIG".

Can someone find out what was really on the marker, what was chiseled off, and correct this? It reads as very incoherent.

Bugsi (talk) 07:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC) Bugsi[reply]

It is very clear. The last sentence on the marker should say "There is NO danger to visitors" and someone scratched out the word no so it reads "There is danger to visitors."

Click on the photograph if you need visual evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.165.61.69 (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When were the granite markers put up?[edit]

I visited the site of Plot M in 1989. The area was much more overgrown than shown in the photo. There were the six smaller markers in a hexagonal pattern, but we didn't see a large central granite marker. When were the two granite markers placed at the sites? --134.3.245.157 (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge 'Red Gate Woods'; rename this article as 'Site A'[edit]

Site A is more notable as the site of a Metallurgical Laboratory research facility and reactor than it as as part of the subsequent disposal-grounds of that facility and reactor. 'Site A' should be the principal topic and title of this article, with the history of the site disposal included in the article as a sub-section, or sub-sections. I understand that 'Site A/Plot M Disposal Site' is the name of the two sites considered together as a disposal site, but that is subsidiary to the main topic of Site A as the location of a research facility. 'Site A/Plot M Disposal Site' should not be the article title. I'm not making a formal move proposal today. I also note that Red Gate Woods is not notable other than as the location of Site A, and the material currently in that Red Gate Woods article also belongs in this page. I intend at some point to formally propose that Red Gate Woods be merged into this Site A/Plot M Disposal Site article, which should in turn be renamed to just 'Site A'. - Crosbie 03:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]