Talk:Sisters (American TV series)

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2008. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

First episode banned?[edit]

I clearly recall an all-female show in the early 90s -- and I think it was Sisters -- had its premiere episode banned in some parts of the US due to an opening sequence in which the lead characters discussed orgasms. Does anyone else remember this? It should be mentioned in the article if it was this series as the controversy gave the show a boost in its early ratings. I tried to Google this to confirm, but as you can imagine, "Sisters" and "orgasms" doesn't exactly produce applicable results, even when I toss Sela Ward's name in there. 23skidoo 01:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed in this interview with the exec producer. Someone want to write a snippet about it? Seems like it should be mentioned. Air.dance 13:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SistersTVshow.jpg[edit]

Image:SistersTVshow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 January 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Za wl 10:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters (TV series) → Sisters (U.S. TV series) – Necessary disambiguation from the article for the recent Australian TV series, Sisters (Australian TV series). Sisters (TV series) should now point back to Sisters (disambiguation). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support and speedy close - This is textbook application of WP:NCTV. Also, set up year disambiguation as redirects. -- Netoholic @ 10:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Official WP:RM requests are useful in cases such as these as it will need somebody with WP:AWB access to fix all the incoming links once Sisters (TV series) is moved to Sisters (U.S. TV series) – in this case there will be many of these, I suspect. So I usually prefer an Admin or somebody with WP:AWB close these types of move requests. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and Netoholic. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 23:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and disambiguation purposes. CookieMonster755 ✉ 16:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.