Talk:Sioux San Hospital

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Comments[edit]

please don't sand this article down completely. The history about the sanitorium and the boarding school is true. And the article is an orphan because I have no idea how to work the new system. If you can put links in there for me or tell me how to do it, it would fix it. I just want to make wikipedia bigger and more interesting. Thank you, Troy Small

Here at Wikipedia, we do not care that facts are true. We care that they are verifiable. So please find reliable sources supporting the stated facts, or otherwise, as the stating of these facts is detrimental to a real institution that is currently in operation, the facts will have to be removed even if they are true. See also WP:LIBEL. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHY did you delete all the links I added and the sources????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burmiester (talk • contribs) 18:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because none of those "sources" or links have a reputation for accuracy, and some have a reputation for inaccuracy. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write this...[edit]

Needs less opinions ("Sometimes were...", "Reports got out...", "...is said to be haunted.") and the boarding school section needs more verifiable links.

Has lots of bias especialy "...were forced into the government institution to be taught the white man's way of life." Isn't there a better way to write this?

"These years were the worst in its history (opinion). Experimental procedures were tested on the patients. The disease spread like wildfire with no cure in sight." Needs a verification, otherwise I would consider removing this... 67.158.7.199 (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External Link Appears to be Dead/Building is Demolished[edit]

External Link Appears to be Dead/Building is Demolished 164.154.175.216 (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]