This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No consensus. - BilCat (talk) 01:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NATO reporting name and Sheldon names clearly should be merged. I would suggest the more official name as actual page and the other one as redirect. But which name is more official? Tomdo08 (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - "Sheldon names" don't appear to be related to the NATO system except in that they were assigned to Soviet vehicles. - BilCat (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As BilCat notes, the two schemas are unrelated. In fact, the NATO codenames were classified, so Sheldon's identification system was intended to offer a practical approach for non-classified usage. Askari Mark(Talk) 02:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=small}
