Talk:Seattle Sounders FC/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello. I am going to be reviewing this article, however, I will seek a second opinion when I'm finished as this is my first review ever. Thank you. MobileSnail 15:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria

1. Has reliable sources
2. Is written neutrally
3. No valid cleanup tags
4. Is relatively stable with no edit wars
5. Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint

• Seattle Sounders FC passes the quick fail criteria. The full review will be conducted soon. MobileSnail 15:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Full review

Here we go...

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

• Comments
  • All in all, this article is very well done and is very much deserving of a Good Article status.
  • Therefore, I myself have passed the article, however I will be seeking a second opinion on the final decision. MobileSnail 16:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    • As per your request I have given the article a "once-over" and can't find any real faults; I'm generally impressed with the quality. I have noticed some minor flaws with spacing etc. so it would be worth runnning through the article briefly; I've ammended a couple myself. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Since MobileSnail appears to be having a short wikibreak, with no contributions made in almost two weeks, I shall be passing the article so that there are no further delays. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)