Talk:Sculpey

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 October 2010. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

All done! It looks a lot better with some pictures. Feel free to ditch mine and add your own, if they're better. Is this article still a stub? I think it is but it's better than it was.I am a lemon 07:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you all like what I've done with it. I know my sentence structure is terrible. Feel free to fix it up. Will get pic of block of sculpey as soon as I work out what copyright licence it should have. I am a lemon 06:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many techniques exist for modelling clay, and some even use small wires, similar to how rebar is used in concrete, for finer sculptures. I just removed this and put in a bit of detail about some of the techniques. Someone more knowledgable needs to add some more to this. Going to put in some more pictures. I am a lemon 06:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, i forgot to label my change:-S. I put in the picture. When I have time I'll scan a block of clay in it's wrapper to put in here. Hope you like my pic :-) I am a lemon 05:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about someone put some pictures in? I would but I'm having camera issues. Maybe I could scan something... I am a lemon 03:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fearnot, i shall collect referenes and expand the article as time permits. Ketrovin 13:49, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thank you to a;l editors who are helping to fix this article up.Ketrovin 03:23, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it standard practice to note common mis-spellings in articles? --Oolong 15:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i removed that, it is rather obvious. --Darkfred ^{Talk to me} 13:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

irts not so obvious to everyone. so it was reincluded.Gimmiet 15:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted to the wrong version Gimmiet. Fixed. — Saxifrage | ☎ 19:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

techniques[edit]

the same techniques seem to be repeated here, at Polymer clay and at Fimo. Perhaps this should be a separate article or, maybe both sculpey and fimo articles should point to the techniques section on polymer clay? --Codeczero 05:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]