Talk:Scoob!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trey Parker as Dick Dastardly[edit]

What is y'all's source if y'all keep adding this? Jstar367 (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Like seriously I keep seeing that Tracey Morgan is gonna voice dick Dastardly even when Jason issacs was cast as said dastardly Jstar367 (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welker[edit]

The article currently says "It stars the voices of Frank Welker (who, as the title character, is the only member of the original cast to reprise his role)".

But this is misleading. Welker is an original cast member, but he voiced only Fred at the start. He's only voiced Scooby-Doo since 2002, and even then not consistently. So he's a member of the original cast, and reprising a role he's played before, but he's *not* reprising his original role (for some bizarre reason; wonder how he felt giving up Fred for this movie).

I'm not sure how to put that succinctly so that it fits in a parenthetical.

-- Powers T 15:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New page[edit]

there is a new page now in Draft:Hanna-barbera cinematic universe if anyone want to comeover and help devpolmt 13:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020[edit]

Where's Muttley in the film? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:598B:A2F1:94B4:FA1D:D03B:E6C1 (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Web film[edit]

If this movie was never shown in theaters and never will be, then it should be considered a web film since it's only available on video on demand. So, my edit on that shouldn't be reverted! - Cineplex (talk) 8:25PM - May 7, 2020

The article web film literally says "This term aims to differentiate content made for the Internet from content made for other media, such as cinema or television, that has been converted into a World Wide Web-compatible format." This is not a film developed for the internet, it was intended for theatres, so it's not a web film. BOVINEBOY2008 13:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it's playing in theatres in some countries. - FakirNL (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2020[edit]

Rotten tomatoes critical consensus: Scoob! is fun enough for youthful viewers and some hardcore fans, but never quite solves the mystery of why audiences shouldn't watch old episodes instead. 173.79.40.106 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Hollywood's estimates for digital sales.[edit]

Yesterday, Deadline Hollywood reported about the estimated digital sales this movie made. While they did not give official numbers, do you think what is said might be accurate and worth having on the article?

"Unlike Universal’s near $100M grossing (probably more now) domestic PVOD release of Trolls World Tour, no numbers were leaked out about how Scoob! did, but I heard whispers it made about 35% to 40% less than Trolls World Tour."

[1]

And1987 (talk) 22:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2020[edit]

83.11.247.165 (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: It's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical mistake.[edit]

""Scoob" redirects here. For the titular character (who's given nickname by Shaggy is "Scoob"), see Scooby-Doo (character). For other uses, see Scooby-Doo (disambiguation)" should read ""Scoob" redirects here. For the titular character (whose given nickname by Shaggy is "Scoob"), see Scooby-Doo (character). For other uses, see Scooby-Doo (disambiguation)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.44.187 (talk) 19:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]