Talk:Romanian leu/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 04:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
I will take a look. eviolite (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
I am very sorry, but this nomination is a quickfail, I note that you (the nominator) have not edited the article at all; I see that you are a new user and may not be aware, but articles should generally only be nominated for Good Article status by people who have worked significantly on them beforehand. I recommend you get more familiar with content creation before nominating articles for GA again, perhaps by writing an article on a topic you are interested in.
As for the article itslef, it is quite far from meeting the verifiable GA criterion; the page has 15 kilobytes of prose, yet few references to back it up. Several of the references are bare links and others are dead. There are more completely uncited paragraphs in the article than those that have even one reference, and there are existing cleanup tags. I have marked some of these myself; a large amount of work will need to be done to bring this article close to GA status. I have not checked the article for accordance with the other GA criteria yet as the lack of sourcing warrants a quickfail in and of itself; if you do intend to work on this article, please review referencing for beginners and the criteria. eviolite (talk) 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)