Talk:Rhetorical reason

Philosophy: Logic / Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of language

Lead[edit]

I think there should be a definition either in the first sentence or very soon after it that says "Rhetorical reason is...." etc. It shouldn't wait until the end of the third paragraph. Michael Hardy 02:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it per your suggestion. Jim Tallmon — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTallmon (talk • contribs) 00:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tags[edit]

I think those tags are uncalled for. The article is formatted appropriately, it is clean, and it is clear. It may not be clear to the average person, but it is a well documented area of research within speech communication, which isn't exactly rocket science. JTallmon 02:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing style[edit]

This article reads more like an academic paper and less like something that belongs in an encyclopedia. Also, I'm not sure if it is in good form to write an article and support it with other materials that you yourself have written. -Eric --88.44.115.66 (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]