Talk:R. Rox Anderson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Medicine: Dermatology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Notability[edit]

See also Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies/Academics . Qualifies IMHO. Santaduck 12:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange[edit]

I find the whole article strange and the claims in it do need to be supported. However, the last part of the article:

" noninvasive use of pulsed dye lasers to enabled the administration of vaccines and other drugs through the [ [skin]] without the use of needles."

strikes me as obviously false. There is no way to administer vaccines or any other chemicals with lasers. If a way to do that were ever to be found, the finder of that method would get the nobel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.231.110.119 (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]