Talk:Quesnel River

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Fixes[edit]

I think I'm going to not only fix up the geobox for the Quesnel, but also fix up the text. There is a lot of good info but it is quite disorganised; tributaries, sources, you name it... needs to be organized a bit. Also, is there a way anyone could make it so there isn't a huge gap between the "history" section & the main section about the river itself. That gap makes it look really retarded. AndrewEnns (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed up, a photo is the next thing needed for the article. A good place to take a picture of the river would probably be from the bridge at 52°50′32″N 122°13′29″W / 52.84222°N 122.22472°W near Gravelle. Also, Little & Big Canyon could use photos as well; I don't think anyone even looks at both of those stubs these days since they are lacking information. Putting a photo on a page is one way to get people to look at an article more. AndrewEnns (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]