Talk:Psionics (Dungeons & Dragons)

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Merge / move[edit]

I think this class should be moved to list of psionic Dungeons & Dragons character classes or psionics (Dungeons & Dragons) and have the psionics-related section of list of alternate Dungeons & Dragons classes merged into it. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's moved to psionics (Dungeons & Dragons), I think the psionics section of spells of Dungeons & Dragons should be merged in as well. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I'd like to take this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Psionics, since it concerns several pages. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psion split[edit]

Since Ardent now has its' own artcile, Psion is confirmed for 4th edition and all the general information on psionics is in the main psionics article, I think we should consider splitting the Psion section into its' own article, however I don't think we should risk a split until after the section has expanded and gotten some third-party citations. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conditions for splitting not met 11/11/11 Op47 (talk) 16:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split request tag removed. It's too soon - see WP:WHENSPLIT. Build the section, and source it before either splitting or requesting a split. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 00:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]