Talk:Prince Emmanuel of Belgium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Being bold in a redirection may be fine, but when somebody reverts, it's appropriate to discuss the matter (cf. Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. User:Charles thinks that this individual is not notable, while User:Morhange thinks that he is. The fact that there are articles on him in three other language versions of Wikipedia suggests that other people also think he is notable (but they may all be wrong). Noel S McFerran (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I contend that the young prince is a notable element in his father's life and article but not as a standalone article at this time. The prince is little more than two years old and has hasn't done much other than be born. If the prince was, God forbid, the subject of something like a kidnapping plot or known for more than just having a rather regal name then I could understand the need for an article. However, everything that may make the prince even interesting is best covered in article on those notable topics, such as his father, mother, paternal grandparents and place in the Belgian royal succession. That he is a common element in any of those articles does not indicate a need for this article, which is simply a summary of information best covered elsewhere for now. Charles 01:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prince Emmanuel of Belgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]