Talk:Pop 2 (mixtape)

Orphaned references in Pop 2 (mixtape)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pop 2 (mixtape)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nme":

From True Romance (Charli XCX album): Levine, Nick (19 April 2013). "Charli XCX – 'True Romance'". NME. Archived from the original on 27 April 2013. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
From Sucker (album): Snapes, Laura (2 February 2015). "Charli XCX, 'Sucker'". NME. Retrieved 17 February 2015.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 March 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pop 2 (mixtape) → Pop 2 – The mixtape (Pop 2) and the programming language (POP-2) are the only two articles on the disambiguation page that have similar names, and a hatnote for each article should suffice in directing readers to their intended article. WikiRedactor (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning toward oppose: Aside from those two, at least the email protocol and the gene seem like topics that are also sufficiently prominent to consider (if not also the video game and the other three albums), and I see nothing indicating extreme prominence for this very recent mixtape. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: currently Pop 2 redirectes to POP2 (disamb page), which is a good call. On the POP2 disamb page, there is no way for that mixtape to be the prominent/primary topic. Excluding recentism, the protocol version 2 is way too prominent in long term. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.