Talk:Ponte di Quintodecimo

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Origin[edit]

il ponte di quintodecimo divenne di pietra solo nel 1630. anteriormente era in legno e perciò soggetto a rovina frequente. (cfr V. Cognoli, Acquasanta, vol 2°. i ponti.

I'm aware of that claim (which is inscripted one the brige occaording to some websites. However the reliable sources I've used claim the bridge to be of roman origin. an explanation might be that the bridge was extended/repaired in 1630, if that is the case the info should be included in the article - however not without a reliable source (other than just an arbitrary website). The German version of his article has quite an extensive discussion on that subject by the way.--Kmhkmh (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]