Talk:Philip B.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

[Untitled][edit]

Hello Wiki editors, can you please help me finish cleaning up this page (Philip B.)? I have now added hyperlinks so that it is no longer an orphan page. I have also added categories so that it is clearly identified and aligned with other pages in Wikipedia. I have documented every fact with a source that meets guidelines.

I would appreciate any advice you can offer. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SS-Henderson (talk • contribs) 02:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my page Philip B. is still classified as an orphan. Now that I understand what an orphan page is, I'm concerned that it may not be possible to de-orphan it. Would I have to check with former Philip B. co-workers like Ava Shamban to see if she would add a mention of Philip B. to her page? Paul Begoun has cited Philip B. in her book, Don't Go Shopping for Hair-Care Products Without Me," but I can't create a link from her page, can I? Other possibilities that I've thought of include the Phytotherapy page, which has a "See also list." But he would be the only person on the list, so I'm not sure that would work.

Might it be best to just delete the Orphan tag? I don't think it's likely that the Philip B. page will ever be de-orphaned. But it is a page that people will search for on Wikipedia, I feel sure. He is a big name in his category and is particularly known for his approach to treating hair that focuses on restoring health to the scalp through the application of phytotherapeutic elements.

Thank you for helping me if you can. SS-Henderson (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)SS-Henderson[reply]

Notability issue[edit]

In his category I think Philip B. is notable. Every industry has their own trade publications and so everyone is not going to appear in the New York Times.--WondoMathias (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philip B.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208212702/http://yespleaseenjoy.com/philip-michael/ to http://yespleaseenjoy.com/philip-michael/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]