Talk:Phases and Stages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePhases and Stages has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Fair use rationale for Image:Phases and Stages.jpg[edit]

Image:Phases and Stages.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Adam McMaster 11:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phases and Stages/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Does she really "deserted" him or just "left" him? But overall the prose is pretty good; MOS too.
corrected (deserted--->left).--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Please use {{sfn}} template; Replace AllRovi with Rovi Corporation
Done.--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • ISBN check: ok
  • Dabsolver check: ok
  • Checklinks check: ok
  • Reflinks check: -
  • The references are the only issue.
  • Promoting good work!--♫GoP♫TCN 11:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]