Talk:Peter Twinn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

This interesting article apparently is largely plagiarized from Twinn's obituary in The Times (24 November 2004). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leidner (talkcontribs) 11:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, though most of the material is familiar from other sources too. Would benefit from comprehensive reworking with inline sources, I think. RobertBurrellDonkin (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of this content is very, very similar to the Telegraph obituary which is a shame. Probably needs to be substantially rewritten. RobertBurrellDonkin (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retain Detailed Description of Enigma...?[edit]

At the moment, this biography seems unbalanced, with a good, detailed description of Enigma but relative light on Peter Twinn. I'm inclined towards summarizing Enigma in a paragraph directing readers towards the more substantial page already available. Opinions...? Objections...? Suggestions...? RobertBurrellDonkin (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]