This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Is there any evidence that his failure to get a job in law after university had anything to do with the alleged "prevalence of antisemitism in South Africa at the time"? If anti-Semitism was so prevalent, why was he then given a senior government job without any legal experience?Royalcourtier (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are too many biased and POV expressions here: "brutally cross-examined", "hostile cross-examination" and "regime". This needs to be cleaned up. The description of Yutar as a "relentless opponent of the anti-apartheid struggle" is particularly biased. He was a government prosecutor of criminals, which is entirely non-political. Remember that the Rivonia charges were all crimes proven by the prosecution - even Amnesty International refused to intervene.Royalcourtier (talk) 03:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
