This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
notable for election to city council of 8th largest city in state, covered extensively in that role
Previously notable as district 2's chief of staff
(also, remember to search for "pat kernighan", not just "patricia kernighan") --HectorMoffet (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken the above as a contested PROD and have nominated the article for deletion. I have copied your comments from above onto the article's discussion page. Callanecc (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We've come along way from when the tags were first put up warning of over-reliance on limited sources or primary sources-- definite problems with the [Old Version] to be sure. I know notability concerns remain, but we've added a lot of secondary sources since the original 1-paragraph stub. Have we address that particular aspect of concern? --HectorMoffet (talk) 08:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
