Talk:Parliament of China (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. The dab was changed into a redirect by ASDFGH, and with the hatnote at National People's Congress to Legislative Yuan, there is indeed no need for a dab at all. --BDD (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament of ChinaParliament of China (disambiguation) – The primary topic of China is the country formally titled the People's Republic of China. It follows that subtopics describing "Foo of China" should reflect "Foo of China". I would move this title to Parliament of China (disambiguation) and redirect the existing title to National People's Congress. bd2412 T 01:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: Am I missing something? This page is already a redirect to NPC. Having a look at the page history, it has been since 2003 (10 years ago!), and there was an IP change in 2011 which made it a dab page, before that was reverted yesterday. Since we're already here, do we really need to discuss any further? -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 04:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • We'd move the disambiguation page that was created in 2011 to the (disambiguation) page location -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 07:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect Parliament of China (disambiguation) is unnecessary per WP:TWODABS. Sawol (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am fine with this. My primary concern is that Parliament of China redirect to the "Parliament of" the primary topic of China. The creation of a disambiguation page has been reverted, and I think that this is a reasonable outcome. bd2412 T 20:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • At most, we could have a hatnote at the top of one article leading to another. We probably won't need a dab page for this. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 03:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.