Talk:Outwood Academy Ripon

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Outwood Academy Ripon is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Furthermore, I have just put up an Out of Date sign on this article, as there is a more recent OFSTEAD report availale which appears (at first glance) to be more favourable than the one i used to compile this article. Can't sort it at the moment (Gah! Exams!) but it is important to know. Suicidal mongoose 10:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought i should set up this talk page in case the original advertiser shows his (or her!) face. Wikipedia is NOT a place to put advertisements. If you feel the current revision slanders the college, please feel free to add or change my text, but please cite your sources and verify. I will be available for discussion here should you wish to argue any of my changes.

Suicidal mongoose 17:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the following text from the article: "I believe the description below is slightly opinionated and bias. Please study the history of the school for more accurate results." Not because I disagree with it, but because it does not belong in the article. This article may warrent {{NPOV}} or {{advert}} being added although my feeling is that it falls short of being that bad. If you disagree then add the appropriate tag to the article and explain what is wrong with the article here. Greenshed 17:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 5, 2014[edit]

See edit summaries. I have removed blatant copyright violation from this article, and the attribution of a belief to a probably living person not supported in the ref added. This 'article' has been in this state since June 2006 - seven and a half years - some kind of a record I bet. Acabashi (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]