Talk:Operation Carthage

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Carthage article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific / British / European / Nordic / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	World War II task force

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Responsibility[edit]

Was no one held responsible for the continued attack on the school ? 24.94.41.117 (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well there was the Nuremberg Trials Sirhissofloxley (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, during times of war there is an expectation that accidental damages will occur. It is a war crime if the civilians are intentionally targeted and abused, but unintentional damages are both ethically and legally hard to pin down. The British pilots did not intend to injure civilians, and they undoubtedly suffered from the knowledge of injuring innocent people. 2603:6000:9544:900:1539:99D7:6222:E785 (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results: British Victory?[edit]

The killing of more than one hundred inocent people was a Victory? Just two months before german surronder? WP must have set more higher standard than that... 168.227.97.68 (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No the mission was to damage the other building and kill Gestapo. Which it did Sirhissofloxley (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German Soldiers? Or Gestapo?[edit]

The details of this article state German soldiers, as well as Danes working for the Germans, plus a few prisoners were killed in the attack. However, my question is - were they German soldiers, or were they Gestapo - Nazi Secret Police. Secret Police are not soldiers. This is not apologia - in fact the Gestapo were an even better target than regular German soldiers... but it seems inaccurate. Scout1026 (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]