Talk:Operation Baranja

Operation Baranja was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 21, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Yugoslavia Low‑importance

	Operation Baranja is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Baranja/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No DABs, external links OK
Images appropriately licensed.
Can you add a map covering the Battle of Osijeck? It's difficult to follow the preliminaries without one.
spanning between the villages of Gat and Nard I think that "extending" would be better than "spanning".
river bank opposite Gat–Nard line Need a "the" in front of Gat.
At the same time, Gorinšek was relieved of his duty. No need for "his".
In response to the HV offensive the JNA shelled HV positions Put a comma after "offensive".
while Osijek was targeted for more than ten days after the fighting in Baranja had ceased Do you mean that Osijek was fired at daily for over 10 days, or that it was targeted 10 days after the HV's attack?
number of killed troops of the 107th Brigade Awkward, probably best to reorder as "number of the 107th Brigade's troops killed in the battle".
commending combat performance of the 107th Brigade Add "the" in front of combat.
Put all of your book, article and news report titles in title case. The ones in English, anyways.
Standardize your use of place of publication for books.
Scientific journal articles, to my eyes, implies something like Physics Today, not the Review of Croatian History. Best to drop the Scientific, IMO.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to fail this for non-responsiveness. It's been two weeks and the nominator hasn't edited at all in the last month.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Contact me if you decide to renominate and I'll expedite the process since I'm already familiar with the article. Just be sure to address the issues enumerated above.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:22, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]