Talk:Onyx River

New Zealand Stub‑class Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inconsistent statements[edit]

The statements that the Onyx River flows eastwards, and that it flows away from the sea, are inconsistent here.Eregli bob (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, well spotted. Now fixed. --Avenue (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More referances?[edit]

I don't think that 2 is enough... DERPALERT (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But now there's three... D3RP4L3RT (talk) 00:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But now there's 2 again... D3RP4L3RT (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]