Talk:Ongar, Dublin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why has a single page got its own category? I will try to find another page but if cannot within a day or two, will remove. SeoR 01:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable? Residents[edit]

Where is the evidence of notability of these people? Who are they? Especially "gym instructor Irtiza Malik, male model Junaid Malik and business tycoon Salman Imtiaz" - two names in common, and a gym instructor and a model? SeoR 09:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beats me Seo! (Sarah777 22:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]


Trendy POV[edit]

Will the anon who wants to make disparaging remarks about the "fake" Main Street please desist. It is a street. It is called Main Street. It is the retail centre of the area. It is built to appear similar to a traditional Main Street. You don't like it. That ain't Ongar's problem. Thanks Sarah777 (talk) 11:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By golly 212.58.190.138 I think you done good:) Sarah777 (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the one on the left is over-exposed; there is no sign of life in it; town centre without a single person visible and lacking the moody blue of the one on the right.
Also the one on the right is straight while the one on the left has a very poor positioned shadow streak and a badly positioned van above the streak.
A tiny bit of adjustment to the one on the right; easily done by increasing the brightness - and the tasteless postcard on the left is eating dust!

Sarah777 (talk) 12:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note how the trees have grown between the two shots...Sarah777 (talk) 12:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Left gets my vote. There are shadows in both. There are vans/cars in both. It's a more interesting angle. It's more recent. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could be right...but that photograph replacement editor is in danger of 3rr. I'll work on producing better photos/photoshops than all of the pics here...strictly to improve the project. The new guy utterly failed to WP:AGF. One cannot approve of that :) Sarah777 (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
More seriously, to prevent "photo-edit" wars. I've always stuck to a policy on not replacing a photo unless mine is manifestly superior. That doesn't apply in this case.Sarah777 (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was asked to give a third opinion on this. I prefer the right-hand one but I think a better shot could be taken. If that is possible it would be the best outcome. Meantime there is nothing wrong with using either. --John (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]