Talk:Note-taking/Archives/2013

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

edit carefully

-This should really be edited carefully by someone. I just changed a few things, but this page is particularly sloppy and I've got other stuff to do today. I might come back to it later. -Don't Lie... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.7.233.70 (talk) 18:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal

As EasyScript Note Taking has no actual content on the subject of EasyScript Note Taking, but does have plenty of content on the advantages of notetaking, I propose it is merged here. Hut 8.5 12:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

That sounds fine with me, I approve of the merger. Let me know if I can help out.

Thanks!

Stheorist (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Content Suggestion

I would like to suggest the inclusion of the graphic notetaking method explained in The Evelyn Wood Seven-Day Speed Reading and Learning Program (1994) by Stanley Frank or, if there is a copyright issue, to at least mention that it is a possible alternative. This is a tree-like method of taking notes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.208.55 (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Visual/Auditory Learner

This article gives suggestion to visual and auditory learner regarding notetaking. However no information is available on how to determine who is which. The effects also require citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.76.115.63 (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Guidance material

The inclusion on guidance of how to take notes reads like a how-to manual and does not meet the guidelines of WP:NOTMANUAL. I have removed it on that basis (see diff) but included a link to wikibooks on the same subject where a keen editor could add the exact same material more legitimately.—Teahot (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Is Note taking actually useful - for every one?

Is Note taking actually useful? And for every one?

Is this an encyclopedia or not? How about some citations supporting or non supporting the efficacy?69.250.187.206 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC).