Talk:Norton Rose Fulbright

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Norton Rose Group

Information updated in light of Ogilvy Renault and Deneys Reitz joining Norton Rose Group; Key people added; Expertise areas added; Number of lawyers, employees and offices updated; ‘History’ amended to show NR OR LLP and NRSA are now a part of NRG.

Group added to ‘Norton Rose’ to make ‘Norton Rose Group’. Officially, Norton Rose does not exist. It should either be presented as the relevant entity (e.g. Norton Rose Studio Legale) or as Norton Rose Group when talking about the practice collectively. Please do not remove the word Group from Norton Rose Group when referring to it in text.

09 June 2011

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.116.24.237 (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain changes.--Mediterraneo (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fulbright merger[edit]

Additional news item, which might seem redundant if added to article, leaving it to your judgement to include. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Johnson (November 14, 2012), "Fulbright and Norton Rose Combine To Create 3,800-Lawyer Global Giant", The American Lawyer, retrieved November 24, 2012

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Norton Rose Fulbright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151007102458/http://law-and-business.net/the-future-of-law-is-bright-with-norton-rose-fulbright/ to http://law-and-business.net/the-future-of-law-is-bright-with-norton-rose-fulbright/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

There have been several single use accounts/editors that have puffed up the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Histnewbie (talk • contribs) 00:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]