This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article:[1] There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, so therefor I'm suggesting that the agreed upon sentence be placed after the Golan Regional Council sentence. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any sources to support any part of this article? Population, year founded, anything? nableezy - 18:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following source lists Nimrod as a temporary army settlement that was abandoned due to it being primarily owned by Druze residents and that no civilian settlement was established, but that a number of families still live there despite not being recognized by the Israelis as anything at all. Anybody have anything else?
Well, it does exist and is recognozed by the regional council - [2][3][4]. It became a civilian settlment in 1999, and has more B&Bs than residents.Icewhiz (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I cant find it in any of the CBS population statistics. Can you? nableezy - 19:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The 2013 book of Kipnis says (p190) "the state institutions do not recognise it as a settlement", and the footnote to that says "Even though it is not included in the listings of the Central Bureau of Statistics, www.cbs.gov.il, the settlement continues to be counted among Golan settlements by the publications of the Golan Regional Council, www.golan.org.". I think all of that can go into the article. Zerotalk 02:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
