This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
[1]has additional source material. Not sure how accurate it is though, but it has enough stats and so forth to fill out an infobox... ++Lar 05:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC) (Struck because I did use it for that... ++Lar)[reply]
Good job. I like how things are referenced. I changed the images just a tad so it looks cleaner to me, some of the text was split before. Cacophony 08:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, glad you liked it... it still needs work, the history section is too wordy, but I had been at it for about 3 hours and that was enough for one day. Regarding the image movement, I am a big fan of alternating side images (see David B. Steinman for an example) as I actually like the text stagger effect. Or at least I am not so much a fan of images stacked one on top of the other the way it is now. But it's no big deal, I may tinker, I may not. Again, thanks for the feedback. All the bridges across the Niagara need work though... further there seems to be confusion about what some of their names are, making it hard to find information. ++Lar 16:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
call me dumb, i can't tell it it still stands or not. replaced in 1925. ok got that. replaced in terms of traffic flow of course, but was it abandoned in place? demolished? demolished in same year? Cramyourspam (talk) 03:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not there now, it was replaced by the Michigan Central Railway Bridge, but I agree that info about its demolition would be useful. PKT(alk) 21:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
