Talk:New York State Route 118

New York State Route 118 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 12, 2013. (Reviewed version).

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Change of Intersection Template[edit]

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 22:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 118/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 17:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Looks good, just a few housekeeping items before passing. --Admr Boltz 17:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

With your 1905/7 amounts, can you use the {{inflation}} template to provide more current amounts?
The jct list needs a key / footer.

Images[edit]

File:NY-118.svg should be tagged as {{PD-USGov-MUTCD}}.

Still hate that inflation template. If these template upgrades don't make that easier, protest will ensue. Everything is changed for the record. Also, may I ask leaving my GANs alone, personal preference and request at WT:USRD that USRD editors abstain from reviewing my articles. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Would you prefer if I put out for a second opinion, or would you like me to pass it.? --Admr Boltz 20:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass it, just a note for the future. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 22:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass --Admr Boltz 22:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]