Talk:National scenic area (Scotland)

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 February 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Scenic Area (Scotland) → National scenic area (Scotland) – As with other conservation designations, and in line with Wikipedia policy, this page title should not be capitalised as it refers to a class of things, not a single proper noun. Mauls (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per Wikipedia policy and consistency with other conservation designations. Grinner (talk) 12:36, 7 February 2018 (UTC)----[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Scenic Area (Scotland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170311014235/http://www.snh.gov.uk/protecting-scotlands-nature/protected-areas/national-designations/nsa/ to http://www.snh.gov.uk/protecting-scotlands-nature/protected-areas/national-designations/nsa/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is map incorrect?[edit]

I know the map comes from a referenced Scottish Government source (data on current SG online map dated 2012) but do the NSA's which cover a part of what is now the Cairngorms National Park really still exists since its inception in 2003? thanks Geopersona (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen anything suggesting there has been any change to the NSA boundaries, so the Cairngorms (and LL&TNP) ones are still legally defined, although SNH tend to ignore them as the the National Park designation takes precedence. e.g. see Page 6 of the "Special Qualities" report. Grinner (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - an interesting point in itself that NP status does not mean an end to NSA status. cheers Geopersona (talk) 20:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]