Talk:National Gallery of Canada

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Ottawa Mid‑importance

	Ontario portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Canada Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture[edit]

This article contains precious little regarding the architecture of the Gallery, which is certainly a major work of its own... Does anyone have any further information behind the design? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.94.6.30 (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2006

Here's a page on the gallery's website about the building itself. I suggest JFGI for more resources. --RealGrouchy 19:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, an article on the art gallery and no mention on the ridiculously expensive giant spider out front of it? Im surprised. Could someone add a blurb about that? 74.101.96.39 03:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maman is already first on the list of Noted Works. Go take your POV elsewhere. --RealGrouchy 17:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Is there some Wikipedia statement about having pictures on the right side of the page? I'm new here, so I'm still learning things, but in my opinion, it looks best if the images are balanced on left and right.

While I'm on the pictures, surely there's something nicer than National_Gallery_of_Canada_from_Parliament_Hill.jpg‎? It's a rather bleak... How does Wikipedia decide these issues on taste? --Ducio1234 (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it again, I imagine my edit of the photo was reverted because it altered the "Collection" heading, which made the page look messy. Sorry about this confusion. --Ducio1234 (talk) 03:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicer photos may exist, however they must have an appropriate license. If you find such a properly licensed photo, please add one. Flibirigit (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collection[edit]

"as the painting was no more than three strips of paint." This is POV, and I've removed it. The article mentions Carr and Thompson, and doesn't point out that they are not photorealists, so what is the point of this obviously POV (and debatable at best) qualitative description of Newman's work? Value judgments about the art the gallery houses have no more place in this article than similar judgments anywhere else on Wikipedia. Sigma-6 (talk) 21:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on National Gallery of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Gallery of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]