Talk:NASA recovery ship

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No arguments in favour of merging the articles have been made, and after a considerable period of time it seems this discussion can be closed as no consensus to merge. Benea (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merging MV Liberty Star and MV Freedom Star into this article. Ships like these are considered notable in their own right, and have their own articles instead of being in one 'class' article. Benea (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Individual ships should have their own articles. - The Bushranger (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benea --Rlandmann (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, and for that matter, this article has no real reason for existing, other than to be some kind of disambiguation page which directs to those two articles. It could also, potentially, point to the Navy ships that were used to recover the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo capsules. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:58, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I concur with that assessment, that would be useful, too. - The Bushranger (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NASA recovery ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207172339/http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/nasafact/ships.htm to http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/nasafact/ships.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]