Talk:Murder of Isabella Nardoni

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Murder of Isabella Nardoni article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvement of the article[edit]

I've just created the article. Further expanding and improvement of it is really wellcome and encouraged. Maybe someone could add more details and sources. In addition, I'm sorry for using mostly Portuguese-language sources, but I didn't find much English-language media coverage on this. The Google News link I provided may help on this issue, however. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the sources - provided they're credible. However, my main worry is with potential libellous statements. Wikipedia's summary of this is available here and on the related ("see also") pages. I have already changed a couple of sentences into a more neutral tone, and I'll keep an eye on the article - but good work on starting the article! Booglamay (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you appreciated it. Yeah, I think my words may have sounded a bit non-neutral, they might need some changing. But I'll leave this job to someone more experienced on writing in a NPOV. Also, I'm not a native English speaker, so I strongly encourage people to improve the grammar. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One thing the IML and investigation clouded is that they have ACTUALLY confirmed a third person was in there, in the mean time the parents weren't in the room. They hid that long after because they lacked more evidences. So, in fact, they are hiding SOMETHING from public. Who is this third person, however, has not occured to me... Except that, from what I heard, he had an ex-wife. And there is also a possibility someone was hired to do this and then push the blame on them. ~~Anonymous~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.126.66.223 (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Isabella[edit]

Brazilian press released many pictures of the girl, taken by her relatives. Is it going to be a problem if one of those pictures is used in the article? I don't think that copyright is going to be a problem, but I'm still wondering about it. Crane (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit[edit]

Hi there, I've just done a little bit of copyediting here. Can the copyediting tag be removed now? What is the normal protocol for this kind of action (I'm a little new to copyediting). Thank you! Mononomic (talk) 03:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Death Assessment Commentary[edit]

The article was assessed as C-class. Although it's a well-written and in-depth article, it lacks sufficient in-line citations for a B-rating.Boneyard90 (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Isabella Nardoni case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]