Talk:Mughal–Rajput wars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Change the title of this page.[edit]

This article is not about one war in 1525 but a series of battles and skirmishes fought between 1525 to 1750. The minor skirmishes started in 1525. The first major battle, the Battle of Khanwa was fought in 1527. Therefore, the title should not be just Mughal-Rajput war (1525) and should be Mughal-Rajputs Wars. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 02:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this page only about Rajputs of Rajasthan?[edit]

Someone removed a mention from bundelas revolt and said this article is about rajputs of rajasthan not all the rajputs. Shouldn't name of the article be changed to something like Mughal-Rajput wars in Rajsthan or something like that. And a new page can be created for every other rajputs and their struggle with mughals. Sajaypal007 (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is matter of concern Asr99.0979 (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion initiated by a block evading sock. M.Bitton (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Result[edit]

@ImperialAficionado You should not edit MILHIST article. The outcome of the campaign is decided by checking the final outcome, not the intermediate conflicts. If you keep doing this, that might led to the loss of editing privileges. Mughalised (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock. M.Bitton (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mughalised, there is no definite outcome for this war. Pinging @Asilvering @Slatersteven @FDW777 @JBW. I am tired of following this editor. Imperial[AFCND] 14:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment:. The comment the user made is a copy paste of the comment I made to them at Ghurid campaigns in India. They did the same at many places, copying my comment, and pasting that somewhere against me. Imperial[AFCND] 14:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
THis is why this article may well be a bad idea, it is about a series of wars, thus there can be no single outcome. Slatersteven (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I always supported articles for individual wars, if the sources mentions so. The user up there is comparing Ghurid campaigns in India with this article. And posting my same comment to me. I suspect this as a sock of User:R2dra and made a report. User is clearly not here to make constructive editing. Lost my time and nothing else. Imperial[AFCND] 14:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now he thinks I am an Islamist. Imperial[AFCND] 14:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Slatersteven
@ImperialAficionado is a hypocrite,he added 'Ghurid Victory' in results in Ghurid Campaigns in India as well as 'Ghaznavid Victory' in Ghaznavid campaigns in India. Whereas Ghurids and Ghaznavids fought series of wars and lost some of them. Mughalised (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock. M.Bitton (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You need to read wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fyi, I am not the one who decided it was "Ghurid victory" and "Ghaznavid victory", there are WP:RS citing so. And if that was the reason you called me and "Islamist", check my contributions, you might find some other names for me. I am taking a break for sometimes. Imperial[AFCND] 14:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]