Talk:Mound, Minnesota

Infobox

I am thinking about removing this: "According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 12.7 km² (4.9 mi²). 7.6 km² (2.9 mi²) of it is land and 5.1 km² (2.0 mi²) of it (40.04%) is water." It is in the infobox I just added. I don't even know if infoboxes are standard or wanted on pages like this? I think it looks good on this one. Nanabozho 02:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Charles Shaw

I removed the mention of Shaw because I can find no actor named Charles Shaw when I search Google, so I guess he isn't that well known. I can not find any link between Charles Shaw (of wine fame) and Mound, Minnesota when searching Google. I asked the author whose IP address only has this one edit, to discuss the situation. Nanabozho 03:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Up-and-coming stars from Mound?

I removed the sentence "It is home to many up-and-coming stars too (the names of which are not able to be to be listed)" because it is meaningless. There are currently people residing in Mound, Minnesota who will some day be famous? That statement also does not belong in a section about fictional natives either. Mal7798 (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mound, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/699nOulzi?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to https://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)