Talk:MotoCzysz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Non-Notable?[edit]

Anyone have any reasons this is notable? I don't see any at all. If you are going to list MotoCzysz, you might as well list every Chinese Motorcycle manufacturer too. Sure MotoCzysz is a racing team, but that still doesn't make them notable to me. I think this article should be deleted.--Budlight 19:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say they are notable due to their innovative engineering and unusual engineering methodology. These facts are notable about their methodology: the company is headed by a person with a design background rather than mechanical engineering, and they are deliberately oriented around IP production rather than manufacturing. They have been featured for their technical and business innovation in Cycle World and Robb Report (at least). The article will (we hope) be beefed up soon by members of the WikiProject Motorcycling. -- Brianhe 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable third party sources make a company notable, and surprisingly this article actually has some. Aboutmovies 06:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MotoCzysz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]