Talk:Moe Davis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticism[edit]

Under the section titled "The Guantanamo I Know," the last line reads, "Criticisms of Davis's claims in this op-ed included:", with a citation following, but no list of criticisms, as one might expect. Any idea why?--76.104.178.183 03:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explaination of changes[edit]

I am responsible for the changes to this article in Jan 06. My original revisions were conducted in a spirit of fairness; I referenced your own articles to guide my updates. There was no grand scheme to anonymously edit your comments, I was just too lazy to register and felt my revisions were both as minute and factually accurate as to go unchallenged. I am changing it again for what I see as obvious reasons.

The press quote from Col. Morris Davis you take issue with: “’You'll hear about Chris Speer who was murdered by Mr. Khadr. Thanks to American medics who stepped over their dead friend, Khadr is alive today,’ Davis said.” [1]

As for my specific objections to your first paragraph-- at the time Speer was mortally wounded it was thought by many on the scene that he was brain dead, as his injuries were so severe. Secondly, there were two dead coalition soldiers on the ground when Khadr was being treated [2]. Thirdly, one medic did in fact treat both Khadr and Speer, Speer was the additional medic. It’s ironic that you would doubt the accuracy of my revision, when you have relied on news articles from second or third sources to guide your “factual” research on what happened during the battle in question. I disagree with your assertions that Morris Davis has been misleading in his press statements. The facts of the case, which have yet been presented, will end all discussion on this matter. I suggest you wait for the decision in Omar Khadr and let the facts of the case emerge before assuming you know what actually happened on July 27, 2002.

Now, I must take issue with your characterization of Speer (the army medic that died following the firefight where Khadr was captured).

You state: Press reports have widely described Sergeant Speer as a "medic" in a way that I feel is highly misleading-- Speer had been in the Army for something like ten years. He did received paramedic training -- not uncommon in modern special forces units.”

SFC Christopher Speer was an 18D---that is; 18 series, with a designation of D, a SF Medical Sergeant. This cannot be disputed. How you can even begin to argue that this is a “misleading” description of Speer would be humorous if it wasn’t so blatantly offensive. By demonstrating a lack of understanding for basic military training and structure you prove an inept at author for any of these articles related to Speer’s combat death. The course to become a medic in the SF is approximately 46 weeks, a lengthy school by Army standards. Special Forces teams work in squads with varying specialties. So SFC Speer does have the apparently unfathomable capacity to be a medic and a squad leader, extensive combat training and specialized training is what makes the SF both a multifaceted and elite fighting force. Speer died clearing a building thought to contain dead of wounded enemy forces, which he ironically would have then treated and evacuated. According to Layne Morris, another soldier wounded during the attack: “(Omar Khadr's)lucky we had a second doctor there. After Omar had killed our first medic, the second one saved his life.” [3} Speer was fatally wounded before he was able to complete his mission that day.

Finally, Speer is not a “Sergeant” he was a SFC, I didn’t catch this the first time, regrettably. I will revise the article to reflect this; there is a big difference between an E-5 and an E-7.

[1](http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060111/khadr_hearing_060111/20060111?hub=CTVNewsAt11) [2] (U.S. v Omar Khadr http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/d20051104khadr.pdf) [3] (http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4&section=0&article=73159&d=14&m=11&y=200)


-CMST- 15 Mar 06 (unsigned comment from User:Cmst66 20:44, 2006 March 15)

Describing Sergeant as a "medic"[edit]

Press reports have widely described Sergeant Speer as a "medic" in a way that I feel is highly misleading.

When Speer was wounded he was leading a squad of men to search the ruins of a bombed out compound for evidence that it had once been part of an al qaeda training camp. The Americans thought everyone inside was dead.

Speer had been in the Army for something like ten years. He did received paramedic training -- not uncommon in modern special forces units. But he wasn't serving as a medic when he was wounded. He was serving as a squad leader.

The description of Speer as a medic implies that Khadr had already surrendered, and lashed out at a non-combatant. I think it is simpler to just leave out Speer's prior paramedic training, than to put in the couple of sentences that would explain that while he had received paramedic training he was acting as a squad leader when he was wounded. -- Geo Swan 19:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Corrections" from an anonymous Pentagon editor.[edit]

On January 27 2006 a wikipedia contributor editing from an anonymous IP address belong to the Pentagon made an edit with the edit summary, "corrected factual inaccuracies".

The anonymous Pentagon editor removed the phrase about Davis's factual inaccuracies, without offering an explanation here on the talk page. They then added the speculation that American medics stepped over wounded comrades to tend to Khadr's wounds, which strains my credibility beyond the breaking point. That kind of unsubstantiated assertion does not belong on the wikipedia. That both men were treated sugggests to me that there were sufficient medics to go around. But I find it very hard to believe that an American medic is going to walk by another wounded American soldier to tend to the wounds of an enemy. -- Geo Swan 22:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record the accidental release of unredacted testimony in early February 2008 confirmed what I suspected. American medics did not ignore SFC Speer's wounds to treat Khadr first. According to OC-1's testimony American medics treated Speer first, and only then treated Khadr's wounds. Geo Swan (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup tag[edit]

The opening paragraph is fine - it tells us who this guy is - but as someone who knows nothing about him or any issues related to him, the second paragraph comes out of nowhere, and from then on the article makes no sense. What is this all about? If there is some issue or issues surrounding this guy, come out straight and say whay they are. Someone who has not allready read something about this guy in the media will have no idea what most of this article is about, and it appears to be about something. - Matthew238 02:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is ridiculous. What happened to providing unbiased information? I have met the man, heard him speak to an audience in fact, this article is embarrassing. Ajordo 04:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Article is Ridiculous and Biased[edit]

This article is ridiculous. What happened to providing unbiased information? I have met the man, heard him speak to an audience in fact, this article is embarrassing. Ajordo 04:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you have concerns. Do you have the time to be specific about what you are concerned about? -- Geo Swan 02:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism?[edit]

Someone cut and pasted Davis's entire official biography to serve as the introductor paragraph to this article -- IMO this is a clear violation of wp:not. They didn't even bother to wikify it.

The work of employees of US Federal agencies, in performance of their official duties, is in the public domain. So this is not a {{copyvio}}. But it is a serious misuse of the wikipedia. It seriously erodes the idea that the wikipedia is a reliable, independent source of information.

Perhaps this was a well-intentioned attempt by a complete newbie. Still I suspect most of this should be rolled back.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 20:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resignation[edit]

Did Davis resign from the USAF? I thought he merely resigned as Prosecutor, and remained in the USAF. Geo Swan (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following this op-ed in the NYT it says:

Morris Davis, an Air Force colonel, was the chief prosecutor for the military commissions at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, from 2005 to 2007.

  • Morris Davis (February 17, 2008). "Unforgivable Behavior, Inadmissible Evidence". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-02-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

No, he is the Director of the United States Air Force Judiciary and remains on active duty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.205.156.103 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

"Davis also asserted that Sergeant Layne Morris was wounded by the same grenade that mortally wounded Speer. But at least one detailed newspaper account described Morris being wounded prior to the aerial bombardment, four hours prior to Speer's wounding.", the citation[9] does not assert this, are citations mixed up? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 20:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama Information[edit]

http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/greene.asp cites the Washington Examiner as saying:

{Morris Davis, a retired Air Force colonel} stated definitively that Nixon had attended the Dillard funeral in 1970 and Bush had attended the Maude funeral in 2001, a "tradition" of presidential attendance that Obama "bucked" by ignoring the Greene funeral. As it turned out, none of that was true, and Davis, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel who played an important role in the War on Terror and who today teaches law at Howard University, knew it when he wrote it.
Curious about what Davis had said, I looked for any sign that Nixon had attended the Dillard funeral. I went to the Nixon Library website, which has posted the minute-by-minute White House logs of Nixon's activities. They're very detailed; if Nixon had gone to the general's funeral, it would have been listed. I looked through the month after Dillard's death and found no evidence Nixon had attended. Likewise, it turned out Bush did not attend the Maude funeral.

where John A. B. Dillard and Timothy Maude were previous generals killed in Vietnam and on 9/11, respectively.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Morris Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Morris Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACLU Lawsuit[edit]

I was searching for something completely different when I came across an article (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/75275-aclu-sues-library-of-congress-over-firing) about the ACLU suing the Library of Congress on behalf of Morris Davis. I was curious how the lawsuit had turned out, so I came to Wikipedia, assuming the information would be here. In the Post-Military Career section, it did mention that he had been fired from the Congressional Research Service, but there was nothing about the lawsuit. The ACLU's website (https://www.aclu.org/news/col-morris-davis-successfully-settles-first-amendment-lawsuit-speaking-out-about-gitmo-military) says he settled, in case anybody is interested in updating that section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.147.174.68 (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Morris Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Morris Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morris Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent tweet by him, good source?[edit]

Hello All,

I am looking forward to learning what the community thinks about Wikipedia:Twitter as a source reference. I resigned as Chief Prosecutor at Guantanamo over Bush torture program. @ColMorrisDavis

Best, MarkDilley —Preceding undated comment added 22:37, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moe_Davis&oldid=1206894002"