Talk:Mishi Choudhary
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mishi Choudhary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Investigation of potential copyright issue[edit]
Please note that biographical content flagged was derived from the below two sources which are both licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
http://softwarefreedom.org/about/team/#choudhary http://sflc.in/about-us/team-new/
Alternativefacets (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- No, http://sflc.in/about-us/team-new/ is licenced CC BY-NC-SA 3.0, which is not compatible here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've deleted the content. Although one of those links is available under CC-BY-SA, the other (with the same text) is under CC-BY-NC-SA, which as noted is unacceptable, and I'm not at all sure that the one we can use is the original source of the text. Even aside from the copyright concern it isn't a good idea to have an article about someone written entirely by them or an organisation they work for. Hut 8.5 22:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- She joined softwarefreedom.org in 2008. Software Freedom Law Center has existed since 2005. SFLC.in was launched in 2010. The content under CC-BY-SA 3.0 predates the content under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0. Sukarn (talk) 6:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- I've deleted the content. Although one of those links is available under CC-BY-SA, the other (with the same text) is under CC-BY-NC-SA, which as noted is unacceptable, and I'm not at all sure that the one we can use is the original source of the text. Even aside from the copyright concern it isn't a good idea to have an article about someone written entirely by them or an organisation they work for. Hut 8.5 22:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed[edit]
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://barandbench.com/mishi-choudhary-three-legged-stool-law-tech-policy/, http://sflc.in/about-us/team-new/, http://asiasociety.org/asia21-young-leaders/class-2015 and possibly elsewhere too. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)