Talk:Michael Omolewa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Puff[edit]

Even though the subject is notable, this article remains filled with PUFF and excessive material better suited to a CV. Many sections are burdened with undue weight and will need to be radically downsized. I'll have a bit of a go at it myself. Taroaldo (talk) 03:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, made a bit of a dent in it there. That's all I have time for right now. I think the puff is down to a more manageable level. Taroaldo (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Helping this article[edit]

My suggestion would be for editors to try discussing major changes to this article before making them. There has been so much undue weight given to elements of this article, and adding listings of countless trivial positions and such is not helping clear up the issue. Taroaldo ✉ 19:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to accept your own advice? You know very well who is adding the "countless trivial positions and such" to this article, and I'm sure you know how to reach that person. Good luck and cheers. AfricaTanz (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello AfricaTanz. Since you reverted those unnecessary additions, my comment above was clearly not directed at you. Your tendency to attempt to bait other editors, even when they are supporting your position, is counterproductive. The reason I posted the comment here is because we should welcome input from any Wikipedia editor who wishes to work on this article. The point of this all is to improve the encyclopedia, not to run around chastising others on their talk pages. If the issue of these excessive additions persists, then, of course, I will discuss it with the editor on their talk page. I hope we can work constructively together. Taroaldo ✉ 22:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Baiting" is not something I do. You really should stop being incivil. Cheers. AfricaTanz (talk) 01:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delinking UNESCO[edit]

It was linked 8 times already in the article, maybe more. I left it in the lede, the info box, images, and the first appearance after the lede. Was there some reason to keep linking it? Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Publication section[edit]

Any thoughts on trimming this section? --Malerooster (talk) 13:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Michael Omolewa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Omolewa&oldid=1205187602"