This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I've gone through and removed name specific tenant mentions in building articles listed under this page, but left behind generic description such as "retail". I do not see the encyclopedic value of including a URL to or having a tenant list when the basis of notability is for building's historic nature. Graywalls (talk) 09:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Melcous: Thank you for pointing this out. I did not realize it was not a good idea to say what the current status of the building is. Greg Henderson (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Greghenderson2006:, this note was from Graywalls, not me, although I have also removed numerous urls from unfoboxes on such articles. The issue is not with the "current status" of the building, but the linking to commercial websites of tenants in an article about a building - the infobox parameter should only ever be used for the website of the subject of the article - or other forms of promoting contemporary businesses. Melcous (talk) 20:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]