	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't get in goofs when it says Max is wearing a watch on his hand but sometimes on the movie the watch is not there.

Fair use rationale for Image:MaxKeeble.jpg[edit]

Image:MaxKeeble.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Brooke Anne Smith get an article?[edit]

I mean, she does have a decent enough filmography (She was Claire Tate on "Cold Case", Stacey Green on "Judging Amy", Jessica on "My Wife and Kids", Taylor on "House Bend", Tracey on "Malcolm in the Middle", Marsha Chalker on "7th Heaven", and of course, Jenna on "Max Keeble's Big Move"). Plus, we have a little to know about her via her birthdate, her birth-town, her having two brothers, and her education background, plus other info supplied by her myspace page, and some friends of hers. I just feel that she's been without an article for far too long, that's all. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 00:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there have been a sequel to this?[edit]

I feel that there should've been a sequel this made 2-3 years after the original. Anyone else agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendo2dci (talk • contribs) 02:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Section[edit]

Honestly, the Plot section really needs to be expanded, as it is completely unacceptable. It left out several key parts in the plot, including Max essentially ditching his friend's going away party for Jenna as well as discovering that Jindrake was cutting funds from the school. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 11:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC) There should be mention of the animal shelter max was trying to save —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.205.38.93 (talk) 03:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Spelling?[edit]

Is the frog's name McGoogle or MacGoogle- personally it's always sounded like mcgoogle to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.1.45 (talk) 05:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article protected?[edit]

It's not a significantly controversial or incredibly well known film. 2601:204:0:8D30:688D:12D5:FAD8:DFAA (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]