Talk:Maurice Saatchi, Baron Saatchi/Archives/2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
The form "Lord Saatchi" appears to be more common on the internet. So I will be moving this to Maurice Saatchi, Baron Saatchi, in accordance with the life peer naming conventions. -- Emsworth 22:14, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Why does this have such a strange title? SlimVirgin (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- From WP:NCNT:
- Life peers (ie, people who have peerages awarded exclusively for their lifetime but who neither inherit it nor pass it on to anyone else) use the same standard as for hereditary peers: use the dignity in the title, unless the individual is exclusively referred to by personal name. For example: Quintin Hogg, Baron Hailsham of St Marylebone (not "Quintin McGarel Hogg"), but Margaret Thatcher (not "Margaret Thatcher, Baroness Thatcher.")
- The question is: is he ever referred to as "Baron Saatchi"? I have no idea, but if so, the title complies with WP conventions, if not, it should be moved to Maurice Saatchi --Storkk 00:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- From WP:NCNT:
Rich List
The Charles article says that the brothers grouped in 2009 were at 439th place with a joint fortune of £120m. This says that Maurice "was number 366 in the Sunday Times Rich List 2008, with an estimated wealth of £220m in advertising and art". I'm not sure they suffered such a decline at that time. Clues ? -Sticks66 12:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)