Talk:Mark Gerson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Gerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419013259/http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Gerson_MarkRight to http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Gerson_MarkRight
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Claim not supported by source[edit]
The article currently includes In September 2021, the Gerson family made the largest private donation in history to Christian medical missions in Africa through an $18,000,000 donation. [1]
The problem with this is that our source, while perhaps reliable, does not make the claim that it's the largest gift ever. Rather, it is quoting the recipient of the gift saying that it's the largest gift ever, and said recipient is not a reliable third party source for such a claim. Believe me, if you gave me $18 million, I'd say nice things about you. (No, really! Try it and see!) As such, the claim that it's the largest should be removed. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC) Nat Gertler (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this assessment. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-private-donations-to-universities-by-individuals-2019-5?r=US&IR=T This page alone seems to suggest that there are plenty larger private donations, and this only lists those to education. I don't say that this isn't noteworthy but maybe the claim should be modified to reflect actual facts, because as it is here it's simply wrong. GGLibrarian (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @GGLibrarian: I think you're doing a strict reading of the clause order, making "the largest private donation in history" as a stand-alone claim, when I really think it's trying to say "the largest private donation to Christian medical missions in Africa in history"... but even that claim is not supported by the source. Plus, the source is the Christian Broadcasting Network, which has gotten mixed response on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard over the years. I'm avoiding editing articles myself at this point; could you just reduce the sentence to In September 2021donated US$18 million to Christian medical missions in Africa.? --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- That seems to be a fair reading of this. I have changed it accordingly. :) GGLibrarian (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @GGLibrarian: I think you're doing a strict reading of the clause order, making "the largest private donation in history" as a stand-alone claim, when I really think it's trying to say "the largest private donation to Christian medical missions in Africa in history"... but even that claim is not supported by the source. Plus, the source is the Christian Broadcasting Network, which has gotten mixed response on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard over the years. I'm avoiding editing articles myself at this point; could you just reduce the sentence to In September 2021donated US$18 million to Christian medical missions in Africa.? --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
References