Talk:Mario Brero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Related Signpost article[edit]

See related Signpost article: WP:Wikipedia_Signpost/2023-07-17/In_the_media Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia. Wuerzele (talk) 00:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice article. Some statements are uncited: could that be fixed? Schminnte (talk contribs) 01:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schminnte, all statements are sourced and cited in the way WP accepts inline citations (for several sentences in a paragraph eg). If you feel anything is unsourced you should tag that.--Wuerzele (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Wuerzele: I was referring to the last paragraph, which is uncited. Schminnte (talk contribs) 14:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Schminnte , so You mean a single sentence: "In 2021, AlpServices was hacked and an investigation of the leaked data published in 2023 by the European Investigative Collaborations named Abu Dhabi Secrets."?
This sentence is one statement (not some statements) and most importantly it refers to a WP page, Abu Dhabi Secrets where this info is self explanatory. A WP page does not necessarily need a source.--Wuerzele (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the mistake in semantics. As for the sentence, I would suggest including a citation per point four of WP:V#Responsibility for providing citations. It would be helpful to have that cited there as well for the sake of verifiability. That was all. Thanks, Schminnte (talk contribs) 14:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Draft:Mario Brero into Mario Brero[edit]

Draft is more detailed. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Robert McClenon, but the draft is poorly written with lots of repetition, and merely having Camuvin pasting it in here, disregarding structure etc is no fusion. --Wuerzele (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Wuerzele - It is true that the draft is poorly written, and its content should not simply be copied into the article, which would make the article poorly written with repetition. The information in the draft with sources should be added intelligently to the article. That is often difficult and will take time. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cleaned up the dump after writing Camuvin and not hearing back. It is still way too long and a number of claims are unsourced!--Wuerzele (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]