The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
If this article aims to be encyclopedic, why isn't the reason why al-Dayfi was captured and held at Guantanamo mentioned in the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This page appears to have been heavily edited by an editor identifying as the subject himself in edit comments, Mansur Ahmad Saad al-Dayfi, to remove information related to that, which seems relevant to this topic, but also raises thorny questions of sourcing and topic contention.
Handling this isn't really my area of expertise as a wikipedia editor, but I've tagged the page for NPOV issues - I think any wikipedia page where there have been numerous edits by the topic of the page calls into question the NPOV. Suntzu3500 (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I looked back and it seemed the edits purporting to be from the article's subject were from 2020, and reverted. Is there something specific you have in mind that we should add? JArthur1984 (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see. That Telegraph article is paywalled for me. I suggest adding it if you have access, but recommend taking care that there is an RS tying the listed alias to al-Dayfi. Given nature as a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, probably good to also add a source noting that no charges from the US government resulted. JArthur1984 (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also don't have access to the underlying article, and I share concerns on a RS for the alias tie. I also don't think the way it was formatted was the most helpful / encyclopedic; and with this being a living person biography, I don't want to just revert this one.
At the same time, I think the article is pretty one-sided (I can't think of any article on someone who's most notable experience was being locked up by a government that didn't include the circumstances or allegations of why). Some of the citations are to opinion or editorial pieces written by the subject of the article, and we have the admitted subject of the article directly removing non-one sided information (albeit not the highest quality information)
This isn't my area of expertise, unfortunately, but it raises both COI and NPOV issues that will probably not be resolved until someone steps in who does know the area. Suntzu3500 (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
