Talk:Mandi Bahauddin

Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2017

Can you revert an edit made right now? 66.87.68.208 (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

It's unclear which edit you refer to. This appears to be the latest — Andy W. (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Chaudhry Bahadin Gondal

This particular area was uninhabited until Chaudhry Bahaduin a Gondal of the Jat tribe established a trading post. He brought with himself a 'Khatri' of the trding caste and established a Mandi 'trading post' here which became popular and eventually established into the present town. This information was recorded in the census report carried out by the Pakistani government in the 1990's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.142.147 (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mandi Bahauddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922204630/http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=20&dn=Mandi%20Bahauddin to http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=20&dn=Mandi%20Bahauddin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Added four New photos and added seven new sections with a lot of other changes.

Drear Wikipedians, I am a student of "Planning and Management of Tourism Systems" at university of Bergamo, Italy. I modified this article as a part of my exam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage_studies_and_ICT.I have tried my best to make my contributions more authentic and everything has been added with proper references.

My contributions

• I have added official website link in the infobox of the article.
• I added four new photos related to the main attractions pf the city taken by myself.
• I added origin of the name of the city in the introduction with the reference.
• I added new section of foundation of the city under the heading of history with the proper references.
• I corrected the data of administration section according to recent research and explained them in tables.
• I corrected year and data of census in the demographics section.
• I added section of climate with explanation and proper reference.
• I added new sections of languages, economy and transport with updated information and proper references.
• I added more institutions to the list of education section.
• I added another section of medical facilities and tourism with the names of few hospitals and some famous tourist places with proper references.

For any problem or advice, please do not hesitate to contact me. --Satiesh Azam-- (talk)

"City of lions"

I've moved this claim from the article's introduction here:

It is also known as the city of lions.

The document cited has no mention of "city of lions". I've not been able to find any other source for this claim; it's not in the introduction to the Urdu version, either. Bibliosporias (talk) 21:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

I've done more digging. First, I find from the edit history that the claim was inserted at the end of the paragraph, between the existing text and the reference to the District Police Office web site; the latter was therefore not relevant to the claim.

Secondly, I've found a reference backing up the claim. I've thus reinserted the claim, giving it its proper citation, and replacing the original citation in its proper place. I think that it's all OK now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibliosporias (talk • contribs) 21:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

References