Talk:Man with a Pipe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coldcreation (talk) 11:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monochrome?[edit]

Was this originally a colour painting? The article and the source don't say. I assume that the lead image is a monochrome reproduction. I've added this File:Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with a Pipe), 129.7 x 96.68 cm, Carnegie Museum of Art.jpg to the gallery, but the article does not mention it either. It seems highly "related" and it's obviously very colourful. I'd say this was quite an important fact to make clear, one way or another. Otherwise the quote from Metzinger and Gleizes (1912) doesn't make a great deal of sense? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. Yes, you bring up an excellent point. This is a B&W half-tone reproduction. Now mentioned in the article. Coldcreation (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding the mention. How very frustrating that we don't know what the original looked like. I was wondering if the image of Le Fumeur (Man with a Pipe) from Carnegie Museum of Art could be used as more of a comparison at all. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Man with a Pipe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]